 |
| |
| The Radigals Blog |
Name: Radigals
Home: New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
About Us: A pretty rad group of guys and gals dedicated to feminist activism, arts and crafts, community involvement, changing the world, and snacky treats.
See my complete profile
|
| Previous Posts |
|
| Archives |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
| |
Friday, September 18, 2009 |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
| "Values Voter Summit"-Family Research Council Action |
This morning while channel surfing, I stumbled upon this little gem-The Values Voter Summit.The first speaker that I caught was Rep. Christopher Smith from New Jersey. Mr. Smith is passionately Pro-Life, so much so that he lies about abortion and women's health. He refers to abortion as "the culture of death" and the pro-life stance as "the culture of life". His speech focused on statistics about how abortion is "bad for women" and how the pro-lifers and Obama are lying to the American people by using words terms such as "reproductive justice", "women's health", or "reproductive rights", when what they are "really" trying to say is abortion. Rep. C. Smith makes himself out to know what is best for women, but he never once offers a solution to what is to happen to these women who are forced into carrying out an unwanted pregnancy and then what happens to that child. He said that if "Obama-care" passes it could be the biggest " threat" and the "greatest expansion of abortion" in the the United States since Roe vs. Wade.
Unfortunately (or fortunately) I didn't get to see all the other speakers. Conferences such as these show us how much further we need to go in order to secure a women's right to choose.
You can check out their website here http://www.valuesvotersummit.org/ |
posted by Marlee @ 10:22 AM  |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
Saturday, August 29, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Feminist Book Review: The Tiffany Aching Series |
While I originally thought of doing the Twilight series as my first feminist review, I decided to pull back because I feel like everything that could be said about those books has already been said and I honestly couldn't add anything to the conversation. I was originally going to point out how I thought that the series was just as poisonous as Barbie towards young minds and how Edward Cullen's sweet nothings read from the novel of a murdering lunatic. So, I decided to present my antidote to that series with another one that's just as long and much more feminist friendly.
The Tiffany Aching series by Terry Pratchett is an offshoot of Prachett's normal narrative home of the Discworld. The Discworld being a place that is very much like ours except it's flat and rides on the back of four elephants who are themselves on top of a turtle, which is flying through space, is a place which produces some of the best satire this side of Vonneghut. The targets of this satire are God, consumerism, Christmas, newspapers, taxes and pretty much anything under the sun. He even handles the feminist movement in the third book of the series, Equal Rites, boiling down any argument against women's rights to the only one that people ever seem to use: "we can't do this because it's never been done" and then rips it to shreds to show us how incredibly stupid this argument always is. The books are filled lovingly with humor and insight and you can pick up any one of them and spend an enjoyable few days reading them.
This brings us to the Tiffany Aching series which, I can best describe as being for anyone who wished that Hermione Granger would have shoved Harry Potter out of the way and taken the spotlight for herself. Tiffany shares much with Hermione Granger in many aspects, she's incredibly bright, strong and responsible. Sure, she has a group of incredibly strong tiny blue men to protect her called the Wee Free Men, but she hardly ever actually needs them and half the time solves whatever problem she's facing by sure willpower and cleverness alone. She has no powers, she's the young fantasy female protagonist version of Batman except she doesn't even need gadgets.
Terry Pratchett does fantasy very well in that he creates a world that you can wholly immerse yourself in while tearing away the more extraneous and useless parts of it. This is by setting himself up as an enemy of Disney's world of make believe. If someone appears in his books and is described as being beautiful, you can assume that they're an evildoer. Secondly, he creates a new concept of "witch" that destroys the idea of the wicked witch, in that he takes the more traditional and historically accurate version that witches were the ones that looked to the edges of life for people and made sure that they were doing the right thing to one another and themselves. Y'know the kinds of things that feminists do.
The most teling of his manner of writing is in a quote between a witch and Tiffany Aching:
Miss Tick sniffed. "You could say this advice is priceless," she said. "Are you listening?"
"Yes," said Tiffany.
"Good. Now...if you trust in yourself..."
"Yes?"
"...and believe in your dreams..."
"Yes?"
"...and follow your star..." Miss Tick went on.
"Yes?"
"...you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy. Good-bye."
And that's about it, I honestly can't recommend these books any higher than this. I would love to tell you more about them but I fear I would ruin some of the surprises. Pretty much, I think these books are a good addition to a young person's bookshelf to get them to start thinking about things in a different manner. I would suggest getting these for them this year for school or the holidays or just to be an awesome older person in their life.
Next year: the Bell Jar and the Feminine Mystique |
| posted by HighFiveMachine @ 6:55 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Wednesday, August 12, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Idealizing Masculinity at the Cost of Your Health |
Science Daily put out an article today which cites a recent study conducted which looks at "Macho Men", a bunch of middle-aged guys that are everything man. These "middle-aged men who strongly idealize masculinity are almost 50 percent less likely than other men to seek preventative healthcare services, according to a study—the first population-based analysis of men's masculinity beliefs and preventative healthcare compliance—to be presented at the 104th annual meeting of the American Sociological Association."
Interestingly enough the PI (principal investigator) on this piece of research is the lovely Kristen W. Springer, an assistant sociology professor at our alma mater, Rutgers, New Brunswick. She investigated these manly men in both high socio-economic status circles and their low-status, blue-collar brothers. Her research concluded that those in white-collar, high paying jobs are threatened by seeking health care (especially preventative) whereas blue-collar workers put aside fears of threatening their masculinity and seek health care. She also mentions that education had no pull in getting these burly men into a prostate check-up as both highly educated and uneducated men avoid preventative care.
The Critique: This lady did a study on middle-aged men from Wisconsin. That means all white and at the very least holding a high school diploma under their belt. I would have liked to seen what the subjects in this study thought about homosexuality. This could have placed the group of men into one of two groups:
- Ones who are in defense of their own sexuality and/or fear undergoing a rectal examination by a man.
- Ones who believe that everything they do is right and law, therefore they view doctor's orders as a challenge to their masculinity.
Too bad these silly men are putting their health on the line. Then people wonder why women outlive men.
For the full article please visit: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/08/090810174209.htm
Labels: healthnutz |
| posted by Red Stocking Lady @ 12:05 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Thursday, July 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| california fails again |
| At a last minute press meeting California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, decided to cut ALL of the state's funding for domestic violence shelters. Catalyst's, a DV Shelter that relies heavily on state funding to operate, Executive Director Anastacia Snyder states, "We were bracing for the 20 percent cut, but did not believe the governor could, with a clear conscience, cut 100 percent of funding for services that keep women and children safe and alive."
It is unbelievable how quickly decisions like this can be made. What is more astonishing to me, is that in order for this to go into effect numerous people had to agree upon the cut. I cannot believe that the government in California cannot see how detrimental this will be for all of California's residents.
If you know anyone who is a California resident, send them here to sign a petition to urge CA lawmakers to reinstate the funding : http://bit.ly/3jKQSo
|
| posted by Marlee @ 9:26 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sunday, July 26, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| How to Confront Rape Jokes |
In this article from Mother Jones magazine, Jen Philips responds to a co-worker's tweet on a rape joke. First, she lists the possible ways to confront a rape joke:
1. Keep quiet and feel uncomfortable.
2. Try to top the joke with a more offensive one.
3. Initiate a Very Serious Conversation in which you state rape is never funny.
4. Initiate a Very Serious Conversation II in which you disclose your own rape, and mention that you were definitely NOT laughing during it.
5. Talk outside the box. As in, "I knew this guy in college, and he totally got raped during rush and had to go to the doctor! He's in therapy now! It was hilarious!"
The author writes, "I always feel the strong obligation to confront the joke, wait a few seconds hoping someone else will do it for me, then finally give in and say something. None of the options above sound like much fun, but I guess if I had to pick one I'd do #5 because at least then you don't put yourself in the category of the patronizing mega-feminist as parodied in Away We Go."
There aren't many who feel comfortable and confident enough to initiate a serious conversation when in a joking atmosphere, and can also be okay with being labeled a "Debby Downer." One study in the article explains why we feel this, "'People have a general desire to be liked and to appear competent' but those who confront racism or sexism 'are generally neither well-liked nor perceived as competent. Instead, they are often disliked, viewed as troublemakers, or seen as having problematic personalities.'"
Furthermore, "as one study found, though many women say they'd confront sexist behavior, very few actually do. So just because other women don't say anything when they hear a rape joke, doesn't mean they condone it."
The author goes on to suggest education and not confrontation should be used to stop rape jokes. The author writes, "educating young men, jocks and frat boys especially, on male-on-male rape has been found to not only increase empathy and sensitivity toward female rape victims, but to actually increase willingness to confront their peers' behaviors."
As feminists, we try to confront, critique, and combat sexism, racism, and other types of derogatory language and behavior. But when we are outside the Women's studies classroom, our ideas can be found patronizing or be disregarded and mocked. If true, then how else can we stop apathetic and offensive attitudes towards rape, attitudes that can deter victims from seeking criminal prosecution because of a fear what happened to them won't be taken seriously by authorities either?
Where does feminism play a role in this and do we have to manage our feminist practices to best confront rape jokes? Can achieving feminist goals sometimes mean that we have to put feminism on the backburner? |
| posted by Suzan @ 9:04 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
